|
Operating Statistics by Neighborhood
The following tables compare the performance of all reporting
hotels in Manhattan from early in this decade through 2007. These
results are categorized by neighborhood: Midtown West, Midtown
East, Uptown, and Downtown.
Midtown West
Year |
Average Daily Room Count |
% Change |
Occupied Room Nights |
Change |
Occupancy |
Average Rate |
% Change |
RevPAR |
Change |
2002 |
29,242 |
— |
8,108,395 |
— |
76.0% |
$182.73 |
— |
$138.82 |
— |
2003 |
30,026 |
2.7 |
8,390,953 |
3.5 |
76.6 |
179.88 |
(1.6) |
137.72 |
(0.8) |
2004 |
29,868 |
(0.5) |
9,161,733 |
9.2 |
84.0 |
200.33 |
11.4 |
168.35 |
22.2 |
2005 |
29,117 |
(2.5) |
9,056,684 |
(1.1) |
85.2 |
234.07 |
16.8 |
199.47 |
18.5 |
2006 |
28,893 |
(0.8) |
8,983,717 |
(0.8) |
85.2 |
262.28 |
12.1 |
223.43 |
12.0 |
2007 |
29,291 |
1.4 |
9,274,114 |
3.2 |
86.7 |
295.21 |
12.6 |
256.09 |
14.6 |
Average Annual Compounded Change |
0.0 |
|
2.7 |
|
|
10.1 |
|
13.0 |
Source: Smith Travel Research
Lalia Rach, Ed.D.
Divisional Dean and HVS International Chair
The
Preston Robert Tisch Center for Hospitality, Tourism, and Sports
Management
Manhattan’s hotel industry soared once
again in 2007, turning in a remarkable performance. International
visitors were drawn to our City, enjoying its cultural attractions
and theatrical performances, filling its restaurants and hotels,
and heightening the cosmopolitan ambience of the retail centers
and sidewalks of New York.
Midtown West experienced a slight increase in supply in 2007,
while demand rose at a stronger pace of 3.2%. As a result, occupancy
reached almost 87% in 2007, the highest level during the observed
period. However, capacity constraints in Midtown West currently
limit major occupancy increases, as most hotels now operate at
near-maximum-capacity levels. Midtown West is expected to experience
a significant influx of supply over the next three to four years,
which should accommodate some of the currently unaccommodated
demand in this area of Manhattan. The limited supply growth enabled
hotel operators to command higher room rates, causing 2007 average
rate to increase by 12.6%, to a record $295.21. Average rate in
Midtown West has risen by nearly $100.00 since 2004, an increase
of over 47%. As a result, RevPAR recorded another double-digit
increase in 2007, of 14.6%, continuing the positive trend registered
in the last four years.
Midtown East
Year |
Average Daily Room Count |
% Change |
Occupied Room Nights |
% Change |
Occupancy |
Average Rate |
% Change |
RevPAR |
% Change |
2002 |
18,129 |
— |
4,898,656 |
— |
74.0 |
$217.42 |
— |
$160.95 |
— |
2003 |
18,087 |
(0.2) |
4,947,904 |
1.0 |
74.9 |
208.45 |
(4.1) |
156.23 |
(2.9) |
2004 |
17,650 |
(2.4) |
5,212,769 |
5.4 |
80.9 |
234.40 |
12.4 |
189.66 |
21.4 |
2005 |
17,648 |
(0.0) |
5,486,294 |
5.2 |
85.2 |
275.87 |
17.7 |
234.96 |
23.9 |
2006 |
17,012 |
(3.6) |
5,304,496 |
(3.3) |
85.4 |
309.29 |
12.1 |
264.21 |
12.4 |
2007 |
16,855 |
(0.9) |
5,318,421 |
0.3 |
86.4 |
343.53 |
11.1 |
296.97 |
12.4 |
Average Annual Compounded
Change |
(1.4) |
|
1.7 |
|
|
9.6 |
|
13.0 |
Source: Smith Travel Research
Room supply in Midtown East declined over the last five years,
causing some of the previously accommodated demand to seek accommodation
in other areas of Manhattan. Thus, demand remained fairly stable
in 2007. As a result of these market dynamics, occupancy increased
by one percentage point in 2007 over the 2006 level. Average rate,
however, grew by a strong 11.1% in 2007, resulting in a double-digit
RevPAR increase for the fourth consecutive year.
Uptown
Year |
Average Daily Room Count |
% Change |
Occupied Room Nights |
% Change |
Occupancy |
Average Rate |
% Change |
RevPAR |
% Change |
2000 |
3,058 |
— |
897,589 |
— |
80.4% |
$303.29 |
— |
$243.90 |
— |
2001 |
2,944 |
(3.7) |
759,099 |
(15.4) |
70.6% |
267.30 |
(11.9) |
188.83 |
(22.6) |
2002 |
2,953 |
0.3 |
731,398 |
(3.6) |
67.9% |
256.39 |
(4.1) |
173.98 |
(7.9) |
2003 |
2,953 |
0.0 |
764,008 |
4.5 |
70.9 |
245.52 |
(4.2) |
174.03 |
0.0 |
2004 |
2,475 |
(16.2) |
704,902 |
(7.7) |
78.0 |
286.86 |
16.8 |
223.80 |
28.6 |
2005 |
1,882 |
(24.0) |
541,239 |
(23.2) |
78.8 |
371.09 |
29.4 |
292.46 |
30.7 |
2006 |
1,818 |
(3.4) |
520,320 |
(3.9) |
78.4 |
409.74 |
10.4 |
321.34 |
9.9 |
2007 |
1,902 |
4.6 |
563,476 |
8.3 |
81.2 |
422.25 |
3.1 |
342.69 |
6.6 |
Average Annual Compounded
Change |
(6.6) |
|
(6.4) |
|
|
4.8 |
|
5.0 |
Source: Smith Travel Research
Uptown Manhattan was the area that was most significantly impacted
by conversions of former luxury and upper-upscale hotels to condominiums.
This trend caused supply to decrease by 1,135 rooms from 2003
to 2006. In 2007, supply expanded by 4.6% due to the reopening
of the Empire hotel as well as the further establishment in the
market of the Courtyard on the Upper East Side. This increase
in supply was offset by a greater increase in demand within the
Uptown neighborhood, resulting in an occupancy of over 80% in
2007. The strong compression in this area enabled hotel operators
to push average rate from roundly $246.00 in 2003 to over $422.00
as of 2007, an increase of nearly 72%.
Downtown
Year |
Average Daily Room Count |
% Change |
Occupied Room Nights |
% Change |
% Occupancy |
Average Rate |
% Change |
RevPAR |
% Change |
2000 |
2,537 |
— |
759,931 |
— |
82.1 |
$267.38 |
— |
$219.44 |
— |
2001 |
2,618 |
3.2 |
721,211 |
(5.1) |
75.5 |
240.59 |
(10.0) |
181.60 |
(17.2) |
2002 |
2,741 |
4.7 |
758,034 |
5.1 |
75.8 |
230.12 |
(4.4) |
174.37 |
(4.0) |
2003 |
3,275 |
19.5 |
910,871 |
20.2 |
76.2 |
229.75 |
(0.2) |
175.07 |
0.4 |
2004 |
3,505 |
7.0 |
1,048,261 |
15.1 |
81.9 |
250.51 |
9.0 |
205.29 |
17.3 |
2005 |
3,547 |
1.2 |
1,094,774 |
4.4 |
84.6 |
286.35 |
14.3 |
242.14 |
18.0 |
2006 |
3,601 |
1.5 |
1,126,657 |
2.9 |
85.7 |
324.85 |
13.4 |
278.42 |
15.0 |
2007 |
3,625 |
0.6 |
1,152,964 |
2.3 |
87.1 |
364.21 |
12.1 |
317.38 |
14.0 |
Average Annual Compounded
Change |
5.2 |
|
6.1 |
|
|
4.5 |
|
5.4 |
Source: Smith Travel Research
Since the reopening in 2003 of several Downtown Manhattan hotels
that had been partially destroyed by the September 11, 2001, terrorist
attacks, this lodging market has experienced only limited growth
in supply. Demand, however, grew more strongly, causing occupancy
to increase to roundly 87% as of 2007. This high occupancy level
indicates the presence of a noteworthy amount of unaccommodated
demand in the area, which is expected to be accommodated by the
large number of new hotels forecast to enter the market in the
next two to three years. Continuing the positive trend observed
since 2004, average rate in the Downtown market registered another
healthy increase, of 12.1% in 2007, rising to $364.21 and contributing
to a double-digit RevPAR increase.
|
|